lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs: wipe off the compiler warn
On 2016/7/30 7:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:46:39 +0800 zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
>>
>> when compile the kenrel code, I happens to the following warn.
>> fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c:1156:2: warning: ___new_insert_key___ may be used
>> uninitialized in this function.
>> memcpy(new_insert_key_addr, &new_insert_key, KEY_SIZE);
>> ^
>> The patch just fix it to avoid the warn.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c b/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c
>> index b751eea..512ce95 100644
>> --- a/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c
>> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/ibalance.c
>> @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ int balance_internal(struct tree_balance *tb,
>> int order;
>> int insert_num, n, k;
>> struct buffer_head *S_new;
>> - struct item_head new_insert_key;
>> + struct item_head uninitialized_var(new_insert_key);
>> struct buffer_head *new_insert_ptr = NULL;
>> struct item_head *new_insert_key_addr = insert_key;
> How do we know this isn't a real bug? It isn't obvious to me that this
> warning is a false positive.
>
>
> .
>
yes ,it maybe a real bug, I will resend it in v2.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-30 05:21    [W:0.050 / U:2.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site