[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched/core: add taint on "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Vegard Nossum <> writes:
> > Seeing this, it occurs to me that we should probably add a taint here:
> Taint has traditionally meant "the user did something unsupported, take
> the bug report with a grain of salt". Such as force removing a module.

We have changed the meaning of taint quite some time ago. It also denotes
e.g. that there was a bug, warning etc. So it's not necessarily 'user did
something wrong'.

It's very helpful to see that there was already a warnon/bug before the
backtrace you get from the reporter.



 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-29 15:41    [W:0.059 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site