[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3] net: sched: convert qdisc linked list to hashtable
Hi Jiri,

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:14:58PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>[ added CCs ]
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi,
>> [auto build test ERROR on net/master]
>> [also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc7 next-20160711]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>> url:
>> config: arm-tct_hammer_defconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
>> reproduce:
>> wget -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make.cross ARCH=arm
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/built-in.o: In function `dev_activate':
>> >> wext-proc.c:(.text+0x38544): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
>This issue is be there even without my patch (but with qdisc_list_add
>instead), isn't it?

Yes it looks so, this number happens in a number of places:

dns_query.c:(.text+0x39b84): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
include/linux/netdevice.h:1935: undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
net/core/netevent.c:31: undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
net/sched/sch_generic.c:789: undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
sch_generic.c:(.text+0x33487): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
switchdev.c:(.text+0x3bf58): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
sysctl_net.c:(.text+0x31f70): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
(.text.dev_activate+0x228): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
(.text+0x37d0b): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'
wext-proc.c:(.text+0x390a8): undefined reference to `qdisc_hash_add'

>The problem is that sch_generic.c (where dev_activate() is) is being
>compiled everytime CONFIG_NET is set, but sch_api.c (where
>qdisc_list_add() is defined) only when CONFIG_NET_SCHED is set (and there
>is no stub for !CONFIG_NET_SCHED case).

So it looks like a more general problem than specific to this patch.


 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-28 15:21    [W:0.084 / U:1.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site