Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: staging: ks7010: Rename jump labels | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:30:28 +0200 |
| |
> I have a lot of other things to work on, of much greater interest (to me.)
This is fine.
Thanks for your feedback.
>>> Personally I see no value in such statistics. >> >> Do they indicate any code smells eventually? > > I have no idea what you mean, sorry.
How do you think about to take another look at additional views around software development methodologies?
Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_smell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_metric#Common_software_measurements
Do you occasionally care about a length distribution for identifiers (like goto labels) of up to 39 characters?
> You keep asking more and more from me.
I am looking also for further clarification based on your responses.
> May I remind you this is your "project" in the first place, not mine?
I invite also others to contribute to such a software evolution.
> If you have no idea what should be done,
I have got some ideas for changes. I am just unsure on how the corresponding acceptance will evolve.
> or even whether anything should be done, then just move on to something else.
This can also happen.
> I have already expressed all my views on this topic
I guess that related information will be reconsidered later.
> and am not willing to say anything more about it.
I would interpret the suggestion "CodingStyle: Clarify and complete chapter 7" in the way that your interest grew for a moment. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/25/207 https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1195846.html
I am curious if you are going to contribute to the proposed improvement a bit more.
Regards, Markus
| |