lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 0/1] (Was: introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers)
On 07/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> IMHO this makes sense in any case, but mostly this is preparation for
> another change: show_state_filter() should be preemptible. But this needs
> more discussion, I'll write another email/patch when I fully understand
> the hard-lockup caused by sysrq-t.

Yes, we need to do something with show_state_filter() anyway, I think.

OTOH, I believe this simple change in multi_cpu_stop() makes sense too
regardless.

Oleg.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-26 21:41    [W:0.323 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site