Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:57:12 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/1] (Was: introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers) |
| |
On 07/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > IMHO this makes sense in any case, but mostly this is preparation for > another change: show_state_filter() should be preemptible. But this needs > more discussion, I'll write another email/patch when I fully understand > the hard-lockup caused by sysrq-t.
Yes, we need to do something with show_state_filter() anyway, I think.
OTOH, I believe this simple change in multi_cpu_stop() makes sense too regardless.
Oleg.
| |