lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v3 09/13] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations balance at wake-up
Date
Currently, SD_WAKE_AFFINE always takes priority over wakeup balancing if
SD_BALANCE_WAKE is set on the sched_domains. For asymmetric
configurations SD_WAKE_AFFINE is only desirable if the waking task's
compute demand (utilization) is suitable for the waking cpu and the
previous cpu, and all cpus within their respective
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES domains (sd_llc). If not, let wakeup balancing
take over (find_idlest_{group, cpu}()).

This patch makes affine wake-ups conditional on whether both the waker
cpu and prev_cpu has sufficient capacity for the waking task, or not,
assuming that the cpu capacities within an SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES domain
(sd_llc) are homogeneous.

cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c1c0aa8b300b..9e217eff3daf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_sched_shares_window = 10000000UL;
unsigned int sysctl_sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice = 5000UL;
#endif

+/*
+ * The margin used when comparing utilization with cpu capacity:
+ * util * 1024 < capacity * margin
+ */
+unsigned int capacity_margin = 1280; /* ~20% */
+
static inline void update_load_add(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long inc)
{
lw->weight += inc;
@@ -5366,6 +5372,25 @@ static int cpu_util(int cpu)
return (util >= capacity) ? capacity : util;
}

+static inline int task_util(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return p->se.avg.util_avg;
+}
+
+static int wake_cap(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int prev_cpu)
+{
+ long min_cap, max_cap;
+
+ min_cap = min(capacity_orig_of(prev_cpu), capacity_orig_of(cpu));
+ max_cap = cpu_rq(cpu)->rd->max_cpu_capacity;
+
+ /* Minimum capacity is close to max, no need to abort wake_affine */
+ if (max_cap - min_cap < max_cap >> 3)
+ return 0;
+
+ return min_cap * 1024 < task_util(p) * capacity_margin;
+}
+
/*
* select_task_rq_fair: Select target runqueue for the waking task in domains
* that have the 'sd_flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_WAKE,
@@ -5389,7 +5414,8 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f

if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
record_wakee(p);
- want_affine = !wake_wide(p) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
+ want_affine = !wake_wide(p) && !wake_cap(p, cpu, prev_cpu)
+ && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
}

rcu_read_lock();
--
1.9.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-25 16:21    [W:0.176 / U:0.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site