lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Query] Preemption (hogging) of the work handler
    On 14-07-16, 10:32, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
    > it wouldn't really, this silly question was not directly related to the
    > deadlock we are discussing here but to Viresh's argument that later stages
    > of suspending/hibernation seem to printk many messages in sync mode. so I
    > thought that there might be a small benefit in suspending consoles later,
    > as far as I understand, Viresh has `no_console_suspend' anyway. other

    That option is enabled only for testing though :)

    > than that, I tend to stick to the approach of switching to sync mode from
    > suspend_console().

    I actually need to test it out as well :)

    --
    viresh

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-07-15 00:41    [W:4.180 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site