lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PART2 PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_update_ga()
2016-07-14 16:33+0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
> On 7/14/16 16:13, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> > > unsigned long flags;
>> > > + struct amd_iommu *iommu;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (!AMD_IOMMU_GUEST_IR_VAPIC(amd_iommu_guest_ir))
>> > > + return 0;
>> > > +
>> > > + for_each_iommu(iommu) {
>> > > + struct amd_ir_data *ir_data;
>> > > +
>> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->gatag_ir_hash_lock, flags);
>> > > +
>> > > + /* Note:
>> > > + * We need to update all interrupt remapping table entries
>> > > + * for targeting the specified vcpu. Here, we use gatag
>> > > + * as a hash key and iterate through all entries in the bucket.
>> > > + */
>> > > + hash_for_each_possible(iommu->gatag_ir_hash, ir_data, hnode,
>> > > + AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id)) {
>> > > + struct irte_ga *irte = (struct irte_ga *) ir_data->entry;
>> >
>> > |>> (The ga_tag check is missing here too.)
>> > |>
>> > |> Here, the intention is to update all interrupt remapping entries in
>> > the
>> > |> bucket w/ the same GATAG (i.e. vm_id + vcpu_id), where GATAG =
>> > |> AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id).
>> >
>> > Which is why you need to check that
>> > AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id) == entry->fields_vapic.ga_tag
>> >
>> > The hashing function can map two different vm_id + vcpu_id to the same
>> > bucket and hash_for_each_possible() would return both of them, but only
>> > one belongs to the VCPU that we want to update.
>> >
>> > (And shouldn't there be only one match?)
>>
>> Actually, with your suggestion above, the hask key would be (vm_id &
>> 0x3FFFFF << 8)| (vcpu_id & 0xFF). So, it should be unique for each vcpu
>> of each vm, or am I still missing something?
>
> Ok, one scenario would be when SVM run out of the VM_ID and having to start
> re-using them. Since we want SVM to generate ga_tag and just pass into IOMMU
> driver for it to program the IRTE, we probably can make an assumption that
> SVM would make sure that ga_tag would not conflict for each vm_id/vcpu_id.

I agree, it could enable doorbell to an unscheduled VCPU and therefore
lose the notification.

The per-vcpu list of IRTEs would solve it as well, but making sure that
no two VMs have the same id might be easier and 2^22 active VMs should
be more than enough. :)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-14 16:21    [W:0.047 / U:3.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site