lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Severe performance regression w/ 4.4+ on Android due to cgroup locking changes
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 06:01:28PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Paul.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:18:41PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 05:05:26PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Take the patch that I just sent out and make the choice of normal
> > > > vs. expedited depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT or whatever the -rt guys are
> > > > calling it these days. Is there a low-latency Kconfig option other
> > > > than CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL?
> > >
> > > Sounds like a plan to me.
> >
> > I like the way we like each other's idea. Mutually assured laziness? ;-)
>
> Heh, indeed. :)
>
> Technically, I think the lglock approach would be better here given
> the combination of requirements; however, it's quite a bit more code
> which would likely require some sophistications down the line (like
> blocking new readers first at the start of down_write). If we have to
> go there, we'll go there but for now I think it'd be simpler to
> conditionally switch to the expedited operations. It can be a config
> option which is selected by !RT as you suggested. If anyone hits an
> actual issue with that, we can go for the lglock thing.

Fair enough! ;-)

Thanx, Paul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-14 01:21    [W:0.150 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site