lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] virtio: Return correct errno for function init_vq's failure
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:54:00 +0800
Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/06/16 at 11:18P, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:09:18 +0800
> > Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The error number -ENOENT or 0 will be returned, if we can not allocate
> > > more memory in function init_vq. If host can support multiple virtual
> > > queues, and we fails to allocate necessary memory structures for vq,
> > > kernel may crash due to incorrect returning.
> > >
> > > To fix it, kernel will return correct value in init_vq.
> > The error handling in this function looks horrible.
> >
> > When mq was introduced, init_vq started mixing up several things:
> > - The mq feature is not available - which is not an error, and
> > therefore should not have any influence on the return code.
> > - One of the several memory allocations failed - only ->vqs gets
> > special treatment, however.
> > - The ->find_vqs callback failed.
>
> Yep. And without this patch, it is silent for boot failure. I think it
> makes sense to let user notify about this failure.

Agreed.

>
> >
> > Your patch fixes the code, but it is still very convoluted due to the
> > temporary arrays.
> >
> > May it be worthwile to introduce a helper for setting up the virtqueues
> > where all virtqueues are essentially the same and just get a
> > consecutive number? Michael?
> >
>
> Hmm, How about refactor this function to make it more readable, since we
> do a lot of work in it.
>
> I will post an update to refactor this function.

Anything to make this more readable probably helps :)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-13 14:41    [W:0.042 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site