lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/9] async: Introduce kfence, a N:M completion mechanism
    On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
    > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > > Also, I'm not a particular fan of the k* naming, but I see 'fence' is
    > > already taken.
    >
    > Agreed, I really want to rename the dma-buf fence to struct dma_fence -
    > we would need to do that whilst it dma-buf fencing is still in its infancy.

    +1 on dma_fence, seems to make more sense than plain struct fence.
    Probably best to do after the recent pile of work from Gustavo to de-stage
    sync_file has landed.
    -Daniel
    --
    Daniel Vetter
    Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
    http://blog.ffwll.ch

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-07-13 13:41    [W:3.231 / U:0.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site