Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:06:41 +0200 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/10] perf script python: Fix string vs byte array resolving |
| |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 03:48:10PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:27:16 -0300 > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Em Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:48:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu: > > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:35:52 +0200 > > > Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:52:45 +0200 > > > > > Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hum, so string is not passed to trace buffer with 0 at the end? > > > > > > > > > > strlen() returns only the length of the string (minus the \0 at the > > > > > end). > > > > > > > > yea, is_printable_array is called here on tracepoint > > > > data that's why I asked.. is 0 part of the string data > > > > when stored within tracepoint? > > > > > > Good question. It may or may not (haven't looked at the code), but we > > > probably want to make sure that the function is robust enough for > > > either case. > > > > Ok, applied and tested up to patch 9, waiting for this discussion to > > come to an end to consider 10. > > > > - Arnaldo > > > > > > > > > Or you can do: > > > > > > > > > > if (p[len - 1] == 0) > > > > > len--; > > > > > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > > > > > if (!isprint(p[i]) && !isspace(p[i])) > > > > > return 0; > > > > > return 1; > > > > > > > > yep, seems good.. thanks > > > > > > > > > > OK, great! > > I think Jiri is going to implement the above.
yep ;-)
jirka
| |