lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 03/10] Clocksource: add nuc970 clocksource driver
From
Date


On 2016年07月11日 23:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 3:27:23 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote:
>>
>> +config NUC900_TIMER
>> + bool "Clocksource timer for nuc900 platform" if COMPILE_TEST
>> + depends on ARM
>> + select CLKSRC_OF if OF
>> + select CLKSRC_MMIO
>> + help
>> + Enables the clocksource for the NUC900 platform.
>>
>
> I have put this patch into my randconfig build system and found that
> it lacks a dependency:
>
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> index e18ef32776a3..59b9251eef37 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ config CLKSRC_ST_LPC
>
> config NUC900_TIMER
> bool "Clocksource timer for nuc900 platform" if COMPILE_TEST
> - depends on ARM
> + depends on ARM && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> select CLKSRC_MMIO
> help
>

So this patch, I still need submit or you have merged it?

>
> Also the init function has changed its return type in linux-next:
>
>> +static void __init nuc970_timer_of_init(struct device_node *node)
>
> This now needs to return an error code or we get:
>
> ../include/linux/of.h:1004:20: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [-Werror]
> .data = (fn == (fn_type)NULL) ? fn : fn }
>
> Daniel Lezcano seems to have implemented a migration strategy, but I
> can't see what you are supposed to do here, since the
> CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE_RET macro is no longer part of linux-next.

Wait for Daniel's comments? or what should I do now?

>
> Arnd
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-12 09:41    [W:0.117 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site