lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 1/1] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags from DT to the ipu-di driver
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:18:16PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> The 'de-active' and 'pixelclk-active' DT properties are evaluated
> by of_parse_display_timing() called from of_get_drm_display_mode(),
> but later lost in the conversion from videomode.flags to
> drm_display_mode.flags.
> Use an open coded version of of_get_drm_display_mode() to get access
> to these flags and make sure they are passed on to the ipu-di driver.
>
> Changes vs. v2:
> - removed patches which have already been applied
> - created a drm_bus_flags_from_videomode() helper to prevent code
> duplication as suggested by Philipp Zabel
>
> Changes vs. v1:
> - rebased on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9113791/ as
> per Philipp Zabel's request
>
> GIT: [PATCHv2 1/3] drm/imx: imx-ldb: honor 'native-mode' property when
> GIT: [PATCHv2 2/3] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags
> GIT: [PATCHv2 3/3] drm/imx: remove dead code
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> include/drm/drm_modes.h | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Maybe a stupid question, but why does i.MX even allow video timings to
be specified in DT instead of going through panel drivers like everyone
else?

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-12 17:21    [W:0.099 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site