lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH RT 16/20] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition
4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.

Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index e0ca45754231..797a13d959b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -237,7 +237,11 @@ svc_preempt:
bne 1b
tst r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
reteq r8 @ go again
- b 1b
+ ldr r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY] @ get preempt lazy count
+ teq r0, #0 @ if preempt lazy count != 0
+ beq 1b
+ ret r8 @ go again
+
#endif

__und_fault:
--
2.8.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-12 16:41    [W:0.130 / U:0.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site