[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 18/32] signal: Consolidate {TS,TLF}_RESTORE_SIGMASK code
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski <> wrote:
> In general, there's no need for the "restore sigmask" flag to live in
> ti->flags. alpha, ia64, microblaze, powerpc, sh, sparc (64-bit only),
> tile, and x86 use essentially identical alternative implementations,
> placing the flag in ti->status.
> Replace those optimized implementations with an equally good common
> implementation that stores it in a bitfield in struct task_struct
> and drop the custom implementations.
> Additional architectures can opt in by removing their

There is a small typo in the subject, should be "signal: Consolidate

Brian Gerst

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-12 14:41    [W:0.264 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site