lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Files leak from nfsd in 4.7.1-rc1 (and more?)
From
Date

On Jun 8, 2016, at 6:58 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:

> A simple way to confirm that might be to convert all of the read locks
> on the st_rwsem to write locks. That will serialize all of the open
> operations and should prevent that particular race from occurring.
>
> If that works, we'd probably want to fix it in a less heavy-handed way,
> but I'd have to think about how best to do that.

So I looked at the call sites for nfs4_get_vfs_file(), how about something like this:

after we grab the fp->fi_lock, we can do test_access(open->op_share_access, stp);

If that returns true - just drop the spinlock and return EAGAIN.

The callsite in nfs4_upgrade_open() would handle that by retesting the access map
again and either coming back in or more likely reusing the now updated stateid
(synchronised by the fi_lock again).
We probably need to convert the whole access map testing there to be under
fi_lock.
Something like:
nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct svc_fh *cur_fh, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfsd4_open *open)
{
__be32 status;
unsigned char old_deny_bmap = stp->st_deny_bmap;

again:
+ spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
if (!test_access(open->op_share_access, stp)) {
+ spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
+ status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, cur_fh, stp, open);
+ if (status == -EAGAIN)
+ goto again;
+ return status;
+ }

/* test and set deny mode */
- spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
status = nfs4_file_check_deny(fp, open->op_share_deny);


The call in nfsd4_process_open2() I think cannot hit this condition, right?
probably can add a WARN_ON there? BUG_ON? more sensible approach?

Alternatively we can probably always call nfs4_get_vfs_file() under this spinlock,
just have it drop that for the open and then reobtain (already done), not as transparent I guess.

Or the fi_lock might be converted to say a mutex, so we can sleep with it held and
then we can hold it across whole invocation of nfs4_get_vfs_file() and access testing and stuff.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-08 18:41    [W:0.168 / U:1.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site