lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:35:35PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 16:28 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>
> > I would prefer lower case letters. I don't know the SIDs there are at
> > them moment, other then Display Port. Do you know them?
> >
> > I don't think we can ever guarantee that in every case we will be able
> > to provide a human readable name for the alternate modes if they are
> > vendor defined. We will then potentially still have the names in two
> > different forms: "usbc0.displayport" and "usbc0.svid:xxxx". Is that
> > something acceptable to everybody?
> >
> > I guess if it's not, then to only way to go forward would be to always
> > just use the svid in the name.
>
> Yes, that is better. It makes more sense to use the number.
> We'd get into versioning problems if we use names.

OK, so we'll always use the svid in the name.

Thanks,

--
heikki

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-07 10:41    [W:1.045 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site