lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mmc: core: Fix mmc_select_hs200() regression in v4.7-rc.
On 7 June 2016 at 15:57, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>
>> > mmc_select_bus_width() returns bus width (4 or 8) on success or
>> > zero if unsupported. If bus width is set successfully we then wish
>> > to switch to HS200 mode.
>> >
>> > This avoids the following error message in v4.70-rc2
>> >
>> > [ 2.523674] mmc0: mmc_select_hs200 failed, error 3
>> > [ 2.528516] mmc0: error 3 whilst initialising MMC card
>> >
>> > With this patch card is enumerated correctly
>> >
>> > [ 2.468065] mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
>> > [ 2.468335] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX 7.20 GiB
>> > [ 2.468441] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX partition 1 2.00 MiB
>> > [ 2.468552] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX partition 2 2.00 MiB
>> > [ 2.468651] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX partition 3 128 KiB
>> > [ 2.469269] mmcblk0: p1
>> >
>> > Fixes: 287980e (remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses)
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
>> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 4 ++--
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> > index c984321..aafb73d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> > @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
>> > * switch to HS200 mode if bus width is set successfully.
>> > */
>> > err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
>> > - if (!err) {
>> > + if (err > 0) {
>> > val = EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS200 |
>> > card->drive_strength << EXT_CSD_DRV_STR_SHIFT;
>> > err = __mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>> > @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>> > } else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
>> > /* Select the desired bus width optionally */
>> > err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
>> > - if (!err) {
>> > + if (err > 0) {
>> > err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
>> > if (err)
>> > goto free_card;
>>
>> Looks like this has already been 'fixed' in -rc2.
>
> Ah, it seems I was on -rc1, not -rc2
>
>>
>> Although, this patch does not work for me.
>> mmc: fix mmc mode selection for HS-DDR and higher
>>
>> When IS_ERR_VALUE was removed from the mmc core code, it was replaced
>> with a simple not-zero check. This does not work, as the value checked
>> is the return value for mmc_select_bus_width, which returns the set
>> bit width on success. This made eMMC modes higher than HS-DDR unusable.
>>
>> Fix this by checking for a positive return value instead.
>>
>> Fixes: 287980e49ffc ("remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses")
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>> Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
>> Tested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> index c984321..5d438ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
>> * switch to HS200 mode if bus width is set successfully.
>> */
>> err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
>> - if (!err) {
>> + if (err >= 0) {
>
>
> This patch looks wrong to me, as if zero is returned by mmc_select_bus_width() it
> means setting the bus width failed, and you most likely don't want to switch to
> hs200 mode.
>
> Ulf - what is your opinion?
>
> regards,
>
> Peter.>

The commit above (mmc: fix mmc mode selection for HS-DDR and higher),
simply restored the old behaviour and that was sufficient to solve the
regressions.

Nevertheless I agree, that if mmc_select_bus_width() returns 0, that
should likely mean that we shouldn't try to switch to hs200. If we
want to change that, let's do that in a separate patch on top.
So, do you see a problem in rc2?

Kind regards
Uffe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-08 00:21    [W:0.139 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site