Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Date | Wed, 29 Jun 2016 23:40:35 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence |
| |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 6/29/2016 5:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> On 6/29/2016 9:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> >>>> Well, this is a rather obvious one, so I'm wondering why it is the >>>> last one in the series? >>>> >>> >>> The first three are more relevant to each other. It makes easy to >>> correlate the changes. >> >> But this one doesn't seem to depend on them and it could be applied >> without them, right? >> > > Sure. It has no dependency.
OK
I've queued up this one.
Thanks, Rafael
| |