lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rxrpc: fix uninitialized variable use
Date
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> > I'm actually more tempted to put a BUG() in there because if any new family
> > support (say AF_INET6) is added, I want to make sure I catch all the places.
>
> Makes sense. Do you want to do the patch yourself, or should I send
> a new one doing that?
>
> Maybe WARN() would be better than BUG()? That would still get the attention
> it needs but not kill the process.

I can stick a WARN() into your patch.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-21 12:41    [W:1.289 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site