lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 2/2] drm/panel: Add JDI LT070ME05000 WUXGA DSI Panel
On 18 June 2016 at 07:59, Vinay Simha <simhavcs@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Vinay,
>>
>> On 17 June 2016 at 19:23, Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> v6:
>>> * emil review comments incorporated
>>> PANEL_NUM_REGULATORS dropped, return ret added at necessary
>>> places, if checks dropped for backlight and gpios
>>
>> Looks like some of my suggestions went below the radar. Did you miss
>> them or I've I lost the plot somewhere ? In case of the latter don't
>> be shy to point out :-)
>>
>>
>>> +struct jdi_panel {
>>> + struct drm_panel base;
>>> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
>>> +
>>> + struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[3];
>>> +
>> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_names)];
>>
>>
>>> +static int jdi_panel_off(struct jdi_panel *jdi)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = jdi->dsi;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + dsi->mode_flags &= ~MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
>>> +
>>> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>> IMHO neither this function nor its caller jdi_panel_unprepare() should
>> stop in the middle/return prematurely.
>>
>> Or in other words - one should change the function return type to void
>> and drop the returns.
>>
>>
>>> +static int jdi_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>> +{
>>> + struct jdi_panel *jdi = to_jdi_panel(panel);
>>> + struct device *dev = &jdi->dsi->dev;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (!jdi->prepared)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + ret = jdi_panel_off(jdi);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set panel off: %d\n", ret);
>>> + return ret;
>> As suggested above, drop this return.
>>
> i can make the function void for jdi_panel_off and drop the return,
> but i cannot make void for jdi_panel_unprepare,
> since drm_panel_prepare requires 0 or negative value.
>
Seems like I wasn't clear enough - all you want here is to drop the
spurious return.

Regards,
Emil

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-19 02:21    [W:0.043 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site