lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/21] time: Add time64_to_tm()
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:52 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:18 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> time_to_tm() takes time_t as an argument.
>>>> time_t is not y2038 safe.
>>>> Add time64_to_tm() that takes time64_t as an argument
>>>> which is y2038 safe.
>>>> The plan is to eventually replace all calls to time_to_tm()
>>>> by time64_to_tm().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>
>>> This looks sane to me. Are you hoping for me to queue this, or would
>>> you like i to go though the fsdev maintainers with my ack?
>>>
>>> In either case.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>
>> This is only used by the scsi fnic driver.
>> I will separate these 2 patches from this CURRENT_TIME series and
>> then both the patches can be merged through the respective trees.
>
> Sorry, this was not quite clear. I've gone ahead and queued this one
> patch for testing, but let me know and I'll drop it if its going
> through a different tree.

Ok.This works too.

Thanks,
Deepa

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-17 23:21    [W:0.210 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site