Messages in this thread | | | From | Saeed Mahameed <> | Date | Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:50:14 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is available |
| |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote: > Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions > in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch > that introduces a problem gets added. >
The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it makes some unwanted noise so we will remove it until we figure it out.
> > Can you check if the fix for the second problem correctly removes the > unnecessary 64-bit division (as opposed to adding a call to div_s64() > or do_div()), and if it removes all traces of 'struct timespec' again? >
Yes, same thing, already fixed, will reply to that thread.
| |