Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:50:36 -0500 | From | Josh Poimboeuf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/13] x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the stack before do_exit |
| |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:28:30PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > If we call do_exit with a clean stack, we greatly reduce the risk of > recursive oopses due to stack overflow in do_exit, and we allow > do_exit to work even if we OOPS from an IST stack. The latter gives > us a much better chance of surviving long enough after we detect a > stack overflow to write out our logs. > > I intentionally separated this from the preceding patch that > disables do_exit-on-OOPS on IST stacks. This way, if we need to > revert this patch, we still end up in an acceptable state wrt stack > overflow handling. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> > --- > arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S > index 983e5d3a0d27..1499db695a88 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S > @@ -1153,3 +1153,14 @@ ENTRY(async_page_fault) > jmp error_code > END(async_page_fault) > #endif > + > +ENTRY(rewind_stack_do_exit) > + /* Prevent any naive code from trying to unwind to our caller. */ > + xorl %ebp, %ebp > + > + movl PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %esi > + leal -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-PT_OLDSS(%esi), %esp > + > + call do_exit > +1: jmp 1b > +END(rewind_stack_do_exit) > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S > index 9ee0da1807ed..394cad73e890 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S > @@ -1423,3 +1423,14 @@ ENTRY(ignore_sysret) > mov $-ENOSYS, %eax > sysret > END(ignore_sysret) > + > +ENTRY(rewind_stack_do_exit) > + /* Prevent any naive code from trying to unwind to our caller. */ > + xorl %ebp, %ebp > + > + movq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rax > + leaq -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-SS(%rax), %rsp
I think this should be:
leaq -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-SIZEOF_PTREGS, %rsp
That way when it calls do_exit(), the stack frame will be placed at the conventional spot where a smart unwinder would expect to find it.
-- Josh
| |