lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] iio: fix config watermark initial value
From
Date
On 06/16/2016 06:16 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
>
> On 16 June 2016 12:56:11 BST, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On 24/03/16 09:23, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>>> On 03/24/2016 10:09 AM, Irina Tirdea wrote:
>>>>> config structure is set to 0 when updating the buffers, so by
>>>>> default config->watermark will be 0. When computing the minimum
>>>>> between config->watermark and the buffer->watermark or
>>>>> insert_buffer-watermark, this will always be 0 regardless of the
>>>>> value set by the user for the buffer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Set as initial value for config->watermark the maximum allowed
>>>>> value so that the minimum value will always be set from one of the
>>>>> buffers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Looks good. This bug was my fault, sorry.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: f0566c0c405d ("iio: Set device watermark based on watermark
>> of all
>>>> attached buffers")
>>> Applied to the fixes-togreg-post-rc1 branch of iio.git and marked for
>> stable.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 1 +
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>>>> index b976332..90462fc 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>>>> @@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static int iio_verify_update(struct iio_dev
>> *indio_dev,
>>>>> unsigned int modes;
>>>>>
>>>>> memset(config, 0, sizeof(*config));
>>>>> + config->watermark = ~0;
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * If there is just one buffer and we are removing it there is
>> nothing
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> After a discussion with Laurentiu (Cc'ed), we noticed that this patch
>> is not in the latest IIO (testing, togreg) tree.
>>
>> What is the path of an IIO fixes patch?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Daniel.
> Should be fixes-togreg then staging-linus then mainline.

To add to that once it is in mainline it will trickle down again through
staging/next to iio/togreg. So there might be a fair amount of pipeline
delay until it arrives in iio/{togreg,testing}.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-16 19:01    [W:0.080 / U:5.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site