lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:30:34 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
> >>>> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 -
> >>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++--------
> >>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
> >>>> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 ---
> >>>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> >>>> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :)
> >
> > So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next?
>
>
> With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes.

I had been waiting for a v2 ;)

>
> With that fixed up,
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>

In that case, you can also add my

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

to the s390 patch.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-16 10:21    [W:0.071 / U:2.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site