Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Date | Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:59:50 +0200 |
| |
On 6/12/2016 3:02 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, > >> From: Wysocki, Rafael J >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for >> table loading >> >> On 5/20/2016 2:57 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: >>> Hi, Rafael >>> >>>> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of >>>> Rafael J. Wysocki >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for >> table >>>> loading >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@intel.com> >> wrote: >>>>> Hi, Rafael >>>>> >>>>> Can we queue this up in linux-next? >>>>> ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions >> can be >>>> seen. >>>>> We need more tests around this experimental change from the real >> users to >>>> have the chances to learn the unknown cases. >>>>> If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by >> reverting >>>> [PATCH 4/4]. >>>>> So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream. >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only >>>> contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next >>>> should only contain material targeted at v4.7. >>>> >>>> For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but >>>> I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released. >>> [Lv Zheng] >>> Great! >>> Thanks for the information. >> Unfortunately, it is reported that the series actually causes problems >> to happen. >> >> I sent you a CC of my response to the report in question earlier today. > [Lv Zheng] > Could the problem be stopped by reverting PATCH 4/4?
Yes, it can.
However, would the series be any useful without that patch?
Thanks, Rafael
| |