lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] usb: USB Type-C Class and driver for UCSI
Date

Hi Guenter,

Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:01:20PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The OS, or more precisely the user space, needs to be able to control
>> a few things regarding USB Type-C ports. The first thing that must be
>> allowed to be controlled is the data role. USB Type-C ports will
>> select the data role randomly with DRP ports. When USB PD is
>> supported, also independent (from data role) power role swapping can
>> be supported together with Alternate Mode control.
>>
>> I'm proposing with this set a Class for the Type-C connectors that
>> gives the user space control over those things on top of getting basic
>> details about the USB Type-C connectors and also partners. The details
>> include the capabilities of the port, the supported data and power
>> roles, supported accessories (audio and debug), supported Alternate
>> Modes, USB PD support and of course the type of the partner (USB, Alt
>> Mode, Accessory or Charger), and more or less the same details about
>> the partner.
>>
>> I'm not considering cables with this Class, and I have deliberately
>> left out some more technical details, like cable orientation, firstly
>> because I did not see much use for the user space from knowing that
>> an secondly because that kind of details are not always available for
>> example with UCSI.
>>
>> So the interface to the user space is kept as simple as I dared to
>> make it.
>>
>> NOTE: In case there is somebody wondering, this is not adding USB PD
>> support to Linux kernel. This is just about USB Type-C.
>>
>
> Hello Heikki,
>
> we have implemented a prototype TCPM (USB Type-C Protocol Manager)
> software on top of your patch set. It will support TCPCI as well
> as other USB-C controllers such as FUSB302. The plan is to use
> this software in systems where no separate controller is available.
>
> Is there any chance to advance this patch set ? It would be instrumental
> to get a unified interface to user space.

A newer version of $subject is already in Greg's queue [1]

[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=0c1849a8c7af652c92ad0265a7ca5934fd773c69

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-06 09:21    [W:0.390 / U:4.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site