lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Y2038] [RESEND PATCH 2/3] fs: poll/select/recvmmsg: use timespec64 for timeout events
From
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
>> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks
>> > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer
>> > acks before I add it to my tree.
>>
>> Agreed. Feel free to add my
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> at least (whoever picks it up).
>
> In reply to [1/3] John said
>
> : Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing,
> : however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two
> : patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so
> : they can go via another tree?
>
> However none of the patches are in linux-next.
>
> John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward
> substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing

Yea. My main concern is just not stepping on any other maintainers toes.

> I'll grab the patches for now to get them some external testing.

I'd be just as happy if the set went through you Andrew.

For the set: Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

thanks
-john

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-05 02:21    [W:0.059 / U:2.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site