lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: host: ehci-tegra: Grab the correct UTMI pads reset
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:14:50AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 08:39 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > There are three EHCI controllers on Tegra SoCs, each with its own reset
> > line. However, the first controller contains a set of UTMI configuration
> > registers that are shared with its siblings. These registers will only
> > be reset as part of the first controller's reset. For proper operation
> > it must be ensured that the UTMI configuration registers are reset
> > before any of the EHCI controllers are enabled, irrespective of the
> > probe order.
> >
> > Commit a47cc24cd1e5 ("USB: EHCI: tegra: Fix probe order issue leading to
> > broken USB") introduced code that ensures the first controller is always
> > reset before setting up any of the controllers, and is never again reset
> > afterwards.
> >
> > This code, however, grabs the wrong reset. Each EHCI controller has two
> > reset controls attached: 1) the USB controller reset and 2) the UTMI
> > pads reset (really the first controller's reset). In order to reset the
> > UTMI pads registers the code must grab the second reset, but instead it
> > grabbing the first.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > Stephen, Alex, Jon, have you ever encountered cases where UTMI might not
> > have worked correctly? It seems that this code was pulsing the wrong
> > reset line and therefore the UTMI pads would never be reset unless the
> > first USB controller was probed before all others. I've never seen any
> > such problems myself, so I'm unsure about whether it's worth Cc'ing the
> > patch to stable@vger.kernel.org.
>
> I don't think I recall seeing USB issues like that, although I don't use USB
> a huge amount. Perhaps the issue just never happens because we always have
> USB1 enabled, and it's physically present in the DTB first, so it always
> happens to get probed first?

Actually for Jetson TK1 we don't enable USB1. It's interesting because
v1 of patch 2/2 only fixed the issue for device where USB1 was indeed
enabled and probed first (I tested on TrimSlice). Running these fixes
through EIMT I noticed that it didn't fix it in the general case and I
was still seeing the warning on Jetson TK1 for example.

That's in fact what tipped me off about the consumer name, because I was
seeing reset 58 (USB2) being requested twice.

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-04 22:41    [W:0.135 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site