lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] time: Add missing implementation for timespec64_add_safe()
From
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> timespec64_add_safe() has been defined in time64.h for
> 64 bit systems.
> But, 32 bit systems only have an extern function prototype defined.
> Provide a definition for the above function.
>
> The function will be necessary as part of y2038 changes.
> struct timespec is not y2038 safe. All references to timespec will
> be replaced by struct timespec64. The function is meant to be a
> replacement for timespec_add_safe().
>
> The implementation is similar to timespec_add_safe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/time64.h | 4 +---
> kernel/time/time.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing,
however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two
patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so
they can go via another tree?

thanks
-john

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-04 20:41    [W:0.135 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site