lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range
Hi Guenter,

On 03/05/2016:10:16:02 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:21:41PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > On 03/05/2016:10:07:48 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > > Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > >In fact after supporting max_hw_heartbeat_ms, there should be no change for
> > > >action=0 functionally. However, we would still need some changes for action=1.
> > >
> > > IMHO, action=1 is more of a debugging option, and not something that would
> > > be used normally. I would need to see some evidence that real users want to
> > > have action=1 and a longer timeout.
> > >
> > If action=1 need to be used effectively, then we should have something which
> > would help to increase timeout values.
> >
> > Currently you have only 10 second to execute secondary kernel, which might not
> > be sufficient.
> >
> Previously the argument was that the 10 seconds (assuming the clock runs at
> maximum speed) would not be sufficient to load the watchdog application. Now it

May be you meant "would be sufficient". OK..let me clarify on it.

Currently it takes 7-8 second from the point 1st kernel panics to the point
second kernel boots. (Given, we have D-cache enabled in kexec-tools, for which
community is not yet agreed), anyway..so, it is safe for me as of now. But,
there is only 2-3 second margin. So, I am not sure if all sort of secondary
kernel will be able to make it in that time.

Following minimal code will be able to extend timeout for secondary kernel, and
I do not see anything wrong in it. We are anyway, panicking in ISR, so what
could be disadvantage if we write a wdt register just before panicking?

--- a/drivers/watchdog/sbsa_gwdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sbsa_gwdt.c
@@ -221,6 +221,13 @@ static int sbsa_gwdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)

static irqreturn_t sbsa_gwdt_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
+ struct sbsa_gwdt *gwdt = (struct sbsa_gwdt *)dev_id;
+ struct watchdog_device *wdd = &gwdt->wdd;
+ u64 timeout = (u64)gwdt->clk * wdd->timeout;
+
+ writeq(timeout + arch_counter_get_cntvct(),
+ gwdt->control_base + SBSA_GWDT_WCV);
+
panic(WATCHDOG_NAME " timeout");

return IRQ_HANDLED;

~Pratyush
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-04 16:41    [W:0.069 / U:6.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site