[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 16/24] i2c: allow adapter drivers to override the adapter locking

On 2016-05-03 23:39, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Yes, they look like reasonable complaints.
> Thanks for fixing them. I just sent out my latest comments and when you
> fix those and send V8, I'll apply that right away. I think we are safe
> to fix the rest incrementally if needed. Note that I didn't review the

Sounds like a plan.

> IIO and media patches, I trust the reviewers on those.
> Thanks for your work on this! I need a break now, this is
> mind-boggling...

And thanks for reviewing it!

A question on best practices here... I already did a v8 (but only as
a branch) so I think this will be v9, bit that's a minor detail. The
real question is what I should do about patches 1-15 that are already
in next? Send them too? If not, should I send 16-24 with the same old
patch numbers or should they be numbered 1-9 now? And should such a
shortened series be rebased on 1-15 in next?

Or does it not really matter?


 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-04 16:41    [W:0.168 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site