lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: tegra: fix compatible string for Tegra132 fuse node


On 2016年05月04日 10:25, Wei Ni wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年05月03日 23:21, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:09:37PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>> This patch changes the compatible of Tegra132 fuse node
>>> to "nvidia,tegra132-efuse", instead of "nvidia,tegra1124-efuse".
>>> Because the CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC will not be enabled for
>>> Tegra132, the fuse driver can't find the corresponding node.
>>
>> Okay, that's not really a good reason to modify the DTS. What we should
>> do instead is make sure that the OF table contains the entry on Tegra132
>> builds. Unless the IP block really is different and Tegra124 and
>> Tegra132 aren't compatible in this regard after all.
>>
>> In the latter case the commit message should reflect the real reason.

Hi Thierry,
I read the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fuse/nvidia,tegra20-fuse.txt, it
has description:
- compatible : For Tegra20, must contain "nvidia,tegra20-efuse". For Tegra30,
must contain "nvidia,tegra30-efuse". For Tegra114, must contain
"nvidia,tegra114-efuse". For Tegra124, must contain "nvidia,tegra124-efuse".
Otherwise, must contain "nvidia,<chip>-efuse", plus one of the above, where
<chip> is tegra132.

It mean for Tegra132, it should use "nvidia,tegra132-efuse".

So if we don't change the DTS file, I need to fix the OF table in the driver and
update the of-bindings, is it right?


Wei.

>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> The fuse driver fuse-tegra.c has following OF table:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC
> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra132-efuse", .data = &tegra124_fuse_soc },
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC
> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-efuse", .data = &tegra124_fuse_soc },
> #endif
>
> It defined "nvidia,tegra124-efuse" under CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC, so if we
> don't change the DTS file, we should change it as:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC
> - { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra132-efuse", .data = &tegra124_fuse_soc },
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC
> +#if defined CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC || defined CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC
> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-efuse", .data = &tegra124_fuse_soc },
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC
>
> I will send it out.
>
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> * Unknown Key
>> * 0x7F3EB3A1
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-04 09:41    [W:0.058 / U:2.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site