lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class
From
Date
On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 17:04 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:

> I'm not against leaving the responsibility of registering the alternate
> modes to the drivers. I'm a little bit worried about relying then on
> the drivers to also handle the unregistering accordingly, but I can
> live with that. But we just shouldn't share the responsibility of
> un/registering them between the class and the drivers, so the driver
> should then handle the registration always.
>
> Oliver, what do you think?

Either will do for me. Registration by the drivers is a bit better.
But it has to be the one or the other. Mixing is indeed bad.

Regards
Oliver


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-25 16:41    [W:0.449 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site