Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 May 2016 10:25:36 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon | From | Wanpeng Li <> |
| |
2016-05-24 10:19 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>: > 2016-05-24 2:01 GMT+08:00 David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>: >> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> >> >> I'm ok with this patch, but I'd like to better understand the target >> workloads. What type of workloads do you expect to benefit from this? > > dynticks guests I think is one of workloads which can get benefit, > there are lots of upcoming fire timers captured by my feature. Even > during TCP testing. And also the workload of Yang's.
Do you think I should add an module parameter to enable/disable it during module insmod or current patch is fine?
Regards, Wanpeng Li
| |