Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: add *driver_data for different hardware settings | From | CK Hu <> | Date | Mon, 23 May 2016 17:43:02 +0800 |
| |
Hi, YT:
One comment below.
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 23:05 +0800, yt.shen@mediatek.com wrote: > From: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com> > > There are some hardware settings changed, between MT8173 & MT2701: > DISP_OVL address offset changed, color format definition changed. > DISP_RDMA fifo size changed. > DISP_COLOR offset changed. > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com> > --- > + > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_ovl_get_driver_data( > + struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + const struct of_device_id *of_id = > + of_match_device(mtk_disp_ovl_driver_dt_match, &pdev->dev); > + > + return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data; > +} > + > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_rdma_get_driver_data( > + struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + const struct of_device_id *of_id = > + of_match_device(mtk_disp_rdma_driver_dt_match, &pdev->dev); > + > + return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data; > +} > + > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_color_get_driver_data( > + struct device_node *node) > +{ > + const struct of_device_id *of_id = > + of_match_node(mtk_disp_color_driver_dt_match, node); > + > + return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data; > +} > +
These three functions looks the same with different parameter: mtk_disp_ovl_driver_dt_match, mtk_disp_rdma_driver_dt_match, and mtk_disp_color_driver_dt_match. So merge them to prevent duplicated code.
Regards, CK
| |