lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC 11/13] mm, compaction: add the ultimate direct compaction priority
From
Date
On 05/16/2016 09:17 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> >Wouldn't it be better to pull the prio check into compaction_deferred
>> >directly? There are more callers and I am not really sure all of them
>> >would behave consistently.
> I'll check, thanks.

Hm so the other callers of compaction_deferred() are in the context
where there's no direct compaction priority set. They would have to pass
something like DEF_COMPACT_PRIORITY. That starts getting subtle so I'd
rather not go that way.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-18 15:01    [W:0.097 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site