lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:20:00AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > I debugged preadv02 and pwritev02 failures and found very weird bug.
> > Test passes {iovec_base = 0xffffffff, iovec_len = 64} as one element
> > of vector, and kernel reports successful read/write.
> >
> > There are 2 problems:
> > 1. How kernel allows such address to be passed to fs subsystem;
> > 2. How fs successes to read/write at non-mapped, and in fact non-user
> > address.
> >
> > I don't know the answer on 2'nd question, and it might be something
> > generic. But I investigated first problem.
> >
> > The problem is that compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() uses access_ok() to
> > validate user address, and on arm64 it ends up with checking buffer
> > end against current_thread_info()->addr_limit.
> >
> > current_thread_info()->addr_limit for ilp32, and most probably for
> > aarch32 is equal to aarch64 one, and so adress_ok() doesn't fail.
> > It happens because on thread creation we call flush_old_exec() to set
> > addr_limit, and completely ignore compat mode there.
>
> I assume accesses beyond this address would fault anyway but I haven't
> checked the code paths.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> > index 7a39683..6ba4952 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> > @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ typedef struct user_fpsimd_state elf_fpregset_t;
> > do { \
> > clear_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT_AARCH64); \
> > clear_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT); \
> > + set_fs(TASK_SIZE_64); \
> > } while (0)
>
> See below.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > index 19cfdc5..3b0dd8d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
> > #define KERNEL_DS (-1UL)
> > #define get_ds() (KERNEL_DS)
> >
> > -#define USER_DS TASK_SIZE_64
> > +#define USER_DS TASK_SIZE
>
> I agree with this.
>
> > #define get_fs() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
> >
> > static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c
> > index 5487872..2e8d9f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > do { \
> > clear_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT_AARCH64); \
> > set_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT); \
> > + set_fs(TASK_SIZE_32); \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > #define COMPAT_ARCH_DLINFO
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_ilp32.c
> > index a934fd4..a8599c6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_ilp32.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/binfmt_ilp32.c
> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void cputime_to_compat_timeval(const cputime_t cputime,
> > do { \
> > set_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT_AARCH64); \
> > clear_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT); \
> > + set_fs(TASK_SIZE_32); \
> > } while (0)
>
> I don't think we need these two. AFAICT, flush_old_exec() takes care of
> setting the USER_DS for the new thread.

That's true, but USER_DS depends on personality which is not set yet
for new thread, as I wrote above. In fact, I tried correct USER_DS
only, and it doesn't work

>
> --
> Catalin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-12 16:01    [W:0.109 / U:12.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site