lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
From
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>> >
>> > Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>> > for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
>> > AArch32 state")
>
> [...]
>
>> > David Daney (2):
>> > arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages.
>> > acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
>> >
>> > Hanjun Guo (11):
>> > acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
>> > acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
>> > acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
>> > acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> > arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
>> > x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
>> > acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
>> > drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> > acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
>> > acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
>> > drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> > arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
>> > acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
>> >
>> > Robert Richter (1):
>> > acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
>>
>> I need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14].
>
> There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been
> largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take
> a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way.

That would be 4.7 and 4.8 respectively I suppose?

Anyway, Catalin has ACKed all of them except for the [13/14], so
technically I can apply [1-12/14] now and then [13-14/14] can be
applied when they are ready.

Do you think there will be any problems with merging [6-7/14] into 4.7
via the ACPI tree?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-11 23:01    [W:0.060 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site