Messages in this thread | | | From | "Yang, Wenyou" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4-nfc" | Date | Tue, 10 May 2016 04:50:37 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@kernel.org] > Sent: 2016年5月10日 4:13 > To: Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@atmel.com> > Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>; David Woodhouse > <dwmw2@infradead.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>; Mark Brown > <broonie@kernel.org>; Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>; Kumar > Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > mtd@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas > <Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com>; Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free- > electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>; > Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>; Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@outlook.com>; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4- > nfc" > > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:51:17PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > It is a datasheet bug, for current SoCs, the RB_EDGE3(i.e. bit 27) of > > HSMC_SR register does not exist, the RB_EDGE0 (i.e. bit 24) is the > > ready/busy line edge status bit. So the compatible "atmel,sama5d4-nfc" > > is unneeded. > > The compatible is needed if the SOC still exists. You can list both for the sama5d4 > if the block is the same.
The NFC IP of SAMA5D4 is same as SAMA5D2's, SAMA5D4 hase this issue. This compatible can be removed.
Best Regards, Wenyou Yang
| |