lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4-nfc"
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@kernel.org]
> Sent: 2016年5月10日 4:13
> To: Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@atmel.com>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>; David Woodhouse
> <dwmw2@infradead.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>; Mark Brown
> <broonie@kernel.org>; Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>; Kumar
> Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> mtd@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas
> <Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com>; Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-
> electrons.com>; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>;
> Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>; Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@outlook.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: atmel_nand: remove compatible "atmel,sama5d4-
> nfc"
>
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:51:17PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> > It is a datasheet bug, for current SoCs, the RB_EDGE3(i.e. bit 27) of
> > HSMC_SR register does not exist, the RB_EDGE0 (i.e. bit 24) is the
> > ready/busy line edge status bit. So the compatible "atmel,sama5d4-nfc"
> > is unneeded.
>
> The compatible is needed if the SOC still exists. You can list both for the sama5d4
> if the block is the same.

The NFC IP of SAMA5D4 is same as SAMA5D2's, SAMA5D4 hase this issue. This compatible can be removed.


Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-10 07:01    [W:0.169 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site