lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Regression in inv_mpu6050: 4.6.0-rc5
    From
    Date
    On 27/04/16 16:56, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
    > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:55 -0500
    > Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:26:51PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
    >>>
    >>> This now causes us to crash and burn on the ASUS T100TA Baytrail/T
    >>> platforms
    >>>
    >>
    >> I believe this regression has already been patched.
    >>
    >> Check the latest commits in linux-next.
    >>
    >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
    >>
    >> See if the latest patches fix your issue.
    >
    > It does - as this is a regression can we please get those fixes into the
    > next -rc ?
    >
    I'm afraid I'm lost in this one - which patch caused the regression and
    which one fixed it? The only patches I can immediately see in next
    both introduce and then squish a similar bug, but neither of them
    has hit Linus' tree yet.

    Or are we dealing with what was fixed in:
    c816d9e7 iio: imu: mpu6050: fix possible NULL dereferences
    I had understood that one as more hypothetical than real...

    Unfortunately I'm travelling and I suspect that means this will only get
    in just after the release (so for 4.6.1) once I've confirmed which fixes
    we actually need to backport.

    Jonathan


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-05-01 23:41    [W:4.059 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site