Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [regression] cross core scheduling frequency drop bisected to 0c313cb20732 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:40:56 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 22:59 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 08, 2016 08:50:54 AM Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 08:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > Cute, I thought you used governor=performance for your runs? > > > > I do, and those numbers are with it thus set. > > Well, this is a trade-off. > > 4.5 introduced a power regression here so this one goes back to the previous > state of things.
That sounds somewhat reasonable. Too bad I don't have a super duper watt meter handy.. seeing that you really really are saving me money would perhaps make me less fond of those prettier numbers.
-Mike
| |