lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev
Date

Hi,

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Thursday 28 April 2016 15:16:12 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:37:08AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>> > > pointer and pass that in platform_data. This is really easy, it's
>> >
>> > Sorry but passing a struct device pointer in platform_data is
>> > ridiculous. Not to mention that, as I said before, we can't assume which
>> > device to pass to xhci_plat in the first place. It might be dwc->dev and
>> > it might be dwc->dev->parent.
>>
>> +1. Passing an unref-counted struct device through platform data is
>> totally mad, Arnd you're off your rocker if you think that's a good
>> idea. What's more is that there's no way to properly refcount the
>> thing.
>
> It's the parent device (or NULL), there is no way it can ever go away as
> it's already refcounted through the device subsystem by the creation
> of the child device.

you're assuming that based on what we have today. We could get into a
situation where we need to use a completely unrelated device and the
problem exists again.

> I do realize that it's a hack, but the idea is to get rid of that
> as soon as possibly by fixing the way the xhci device is probe so
> we no longer need to fake a platform_device as the child here and
> can just use the device itself.

okay, let me try to be extra clear here:

We will *not* remove the extra platform_device because it actually
*does* exist and helps me hide/abstract a bunch of details and make
assumptions about order of certain events. We have already gone through
that in the past when I explained why I wrote dwc3 the way it is; if you
need a refresher, there are mailing list archives for that.

Moreover, this same problem exists for anything under drivers/mfd. It
just so happens that they're usually some i2c or spi device which don't
do DMA by themselves.

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-28 16:41    [W:0.574 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site