lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:08:42AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> +/* Using non-compat syscalls where necessary */
> +#define compat_sys_fadvise64_64 sys_fadvise64_64
> +#define compat_sys_fallocate sys_fallocate
> +#define compat_sys_ftruncate64 sys_ftruncate
> +#define compat_sys_lookup_dcookie sys_lookup_dcookie
> +#define compat_sys_pread64 sys_pread64
> +#define compat_sys_pwrite64 sys_pwrite64
> +#define compat_sys_readahead sys_readahead
> +#define compat_sys_shmat sys_shmat

Why don't we use compat_sys_shmat? Is it because of COMPAT_SHMLBA?

> +#define compat_sys_sync_file_range sys_sync_file_range
> +#define compat_sys_truncate64 sys_truncate
> +#define sys_llseek sys_lseek
> +#define sys_mmap2 sys_mmap

Nitpick: there are some whitespace inconsistencies above (just convert
all spaces to tabs).

I think you should also update Documentation/arm64/ilp32.txt to include
the list above.

> +
> +#include <asm/syscall.h>
> +
> +#undef __SYSCALL
> +#undef __SC_COMP
> +#undef __SC_WRAP
> +#undef __SC_3264
> +#undef __SC_COMP_3264

Minor detail: do we actually need to undef all these? Maybe we can get
away with just defining __SYSCALL_COMPAT at the top of the file.

> +
> +#define __SYSCALL_COMPAT
> +#define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) [nr] = sym,
> +#define __SC_WRAP(nr, sym) [nr] = compat_##sym,
> +
> +/*
> + * The sys_call_ilp32_table array must be 4K aligned to be accessible from
> + * kernel/entry.S.
> + */
> +void *sys_call_ilp32_table[__NR_syscalls] __aligned(4096) = {
> + [0 ... __NR_syscalls - 1] = sys_ni_syscall,
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> +};

--
Catalin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-26 19:21    [W:0.219 / U:21.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site