lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 34/41] Documentation: robust-futexes: fix spelling mistakes
Date
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
Documentation/robust-futexes.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt b/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
index af6fce2..61c22d6 100644
--- a/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ vma based method:

- no VM changes are needed - 'struct address_space' is left alone.

- - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes dont
+ - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes don't
need any extra per-lock syscalls. Robust mutexes thus become a very
- lightweight primitive - so they dont force the application designer
+ lightweight primitive - so they don't force the application designer
to do a hard choice between performance and robustness - robust
mutexes are just as fast.

@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ and the remaining bits are for the TID.
Testing, architecture support
-----------------------------

-i've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
+I've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
parsing of the userspace list is robust [ ;-) ] even if the list is
deliberately corrupted.

--
2.8.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-25 09:01    [W:0.387 / U:25.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site