lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/9] thermal: of: Add support for hardware-tracked trip points
From
Date
Hi Brian, Eduardo, Sascha

在 2016年04月21日 09:12, Brian Norris 写道:
> + Sascha
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:48:18PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:35:59AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> This adds support for hardware-tracked trip points to the device tree
>> <cut>
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
>>> index 97b86c5..6ef932a 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
>>> @@ -335,12 +335,14 @@ struct thermal_genl_event {
>>> * @get_trend: a pointer to a function that reads the sensor temperature trend.
>>> * @set_emul_temp: a pointer to a function that sets sensor emulated
>>> * temperature.
>>> + * @set_trips: a pointer to a function that set low/high trip temperature.
>>> */
>>> struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops {
>>> int (*get_temp)(void *, int *);
>>> int (*get_trend)(void *, long *);
>>> int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, int);
>>> int (*set_trip_temp)(void *, int, int);
>>> + int (*set_trips)(void *, int, int);
>> This is unfortunately a diverges from API available on thermal core. Can
>> you please add first on thermal core then, use it in of thermal?
>>
>> I don't want to have callbacks available only via of thermal. If we
>> allow it, OF thermal becomes a separate API.
> What ever happened to this effort?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/59451
>
> Patch 12 and 13 look to accomplish something similar, yet they do what
> Eduardo suggested. I was testing that series at my previous job, but
> unfortunately (for the fate of this series) I left that employer before
> I could finish reviewing and testing it. Perhaps Caesar can resurrect
> and test it?

@Brian
Yes, I can

Sure, I can.

I see the Sascha's newest thermal patches in patchwork.
The following patches are still needed, right?

6446191 New [06/16] thermal: inline only once used function
6446111 New [07/16] thermal: streamline get_trend callbacks
6445871 New [08/16] thermal: Allow sensor ops to fail with -ENOSYS
6445861 New [09/16] thermal: of: always set sensor related
callbacks
6446221 New [10/16] thermal: Make struct
thermal_zone_device_ops const
6446201 New [11/16] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower
trip boundary
6445891 New [12/16] thermal: thermal: Add support for
hardware-tracked trip points
6445911 New [13/16] thermal: of: implement .set_trips for
device tree thermal zones

@Sascha, Eduardo
Can you share your discussion content for the above patches as remembered?

Thanks,

-Caesar

> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-22 04:21    [W:0.067 / U:1.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site