lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver
From
Date
Hi Matthias,

On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 12:58 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 21/04/16 12:26, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/15 19:23, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/09/15 08:45, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >>> Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>> <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar
> >>>>> <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> >>>>>>> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the
> >>>>>>> patch which
> >>>>>>> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver.
> >>>>>>> So it will
> >>>>>>> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure
> >>>>>>> how this
> >>>>>>> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC
> >>>>>>> maintainer
> >>>>>>> tree?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on
> >>>>>> rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq
> >>>>>> wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>> merged by Linus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your explanation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Can you please apply [3] from this set to your dts tree?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will as soon as v4.3-rc1 shows up.
> >
> > I somehow forgot this patch. Sorry for that.
> > Applied for v4.6-next/dts64 right now.
> >
>
> I just realized that CLK_INFRA_CA53SEL and CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL are not
> part of the clk driver.
>
> Pi-Cheng, can you check if they got renamed in the meanwhile? Or do we
> need some clock driver patches that enable this clocks for the series?
>

Thanks your notice. Unfortunately, we still have no chance let patch
with these two clock merged. The last version is [1]. This clock patch
will block cpufreq dts [2] and dynamic power dts [3]. Clock maintainer
is working on new architecture [4], hopefully we can send new clock
patch soon. After that, we will send new cpufreq and dynamic power dts.
So please ignore [2] [3] at this moment.

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-September/369737.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/206
[3]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-April/423899.html
[4]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-March/418796.html

Eddie
Thanks


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-21 14:01    [W:0.081 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site