lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
Date
Hi Lars,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars@metafoo.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:45 PM
> To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xilinx.com>; Shubhrajyoti Datta
> <shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>;
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>; Ian Campbell
> <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>; Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>; Michal
> Simek <michals@xilinx.com>; Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@xilinx.com>;
> vinod.koul@intel.com; dan.j.williams@intel.com; Moritz Fischer
> <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>; Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>; luis@debethencourt.com; Anirudha
> Sarangi <anirudh@xilinx.com>; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> <punnaia@xilinx.com>; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma
>
> On 04/20/2016 10:39 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> [...]
> >> however we should keep the names same as the TRM.
> >
> > Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to
> > equivalent clocks of h/w
>
> Because it is confusing. If you use the same name it's very straight forward to
> understand which clock is being referred to. That's not the case if you come up
> with random new names.

Ok will fix in the v2...

Regards,
Kedar.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-20 13:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site