Messages in this thread | | | From | Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma | Date | Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:30:10 +0000 |
| |
Hi Lars,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars@metafoo.de] > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:45 PM > To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xilinx.com>; Shubhrajyoti Datta > <shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>; > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>; Ian Campbell > <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>; Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>; Michal > Simek <michals@xilinx.com>; Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@xilinx.com>; > vinod.koul@intel.com; dan.j.williams@intel.com; Moritz Fischer > <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>; Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>; luis@debethencourt.com; Anirudha > Sarangi <anirudh@xilinx.com>; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri > <punnaia@xilinx.com>; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma > > On 04/20/2016 10:39 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote: > [...] > >> however we should keep the names same as the TRM. > > > > Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to > > equivalent clocks of h/w > > Because it is confusing. If you use the same name it's very straight forward to > understand which clock is being referred to. That's not the case if you come up > with random new names.
Ok will fix in the v2...
Regards, Kedar.
| |